Lots of teams improve their rosters by adding new players, but the Mets have made a few moves to eliminate people from their team that has actually had more of an impact than adding some players.
Here's a list of the top people that the Mets have let go this offseason that will greatly improve the team:
1. Guillermo Mota - This is a no brainer. Mota was horrendous throughout most of 2007. It seemed like every time he came in there were at least 2 runs to be given up. Sure the Mets unloaded him for Johnny Estrada whom the Mets quickly dumped, but Mota's removal from the roster prevents Willie Randolph from being tempted to put him in close games. For some reason I have a feeling we'll see Mota ditch pitching and try and become an outfielder. Just a hunch.
2. Rickey Henderson - The king of stolen bases will no longer be able to mold the minds of Mets players. Henderson, while possibly the games best leadoff hitter of all time, was not the type of role model you want influencing young players. There are rumors that he got some of the young guys, like Carlos Gomez, involved in some serious gambling debt, and we all know about his lack of work ethic. While Omar Minaya loves him, Henderson's removal will remove a negative influence that I believe he had on Jose Reyes and some of the younger players.
3. Philip Humber - The trade of Humber means more in the sense that it brought Johan Santana to the Mets, but it also prevents us Mets fans and Mets brass from getting to caught up in the idea of Humber rather than his actual talents. Humber was lauded as a top notch pitching prospect that Mets fans wanted to see pitch at the major league level. The Mets have a tendency to rush pitchers along and then get disappointed in their performance mainly because they can't handle the pressure and expectations from playing in New York. Humber was doomed to follow in the footsteps of Bill Pulsipher in there being too much expected of him too early. He's better off in Minnesota with some chance to grow, and the Mets can focus on molding Mike Pelfrey into the pitcher we know he can be.
Showing posts with label philiphumber. Show all posts
Showing posts with label philiphumber. Show all posts
Friday, February 8, 2008
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Mets Magic Number is 4
We don't deserve it to be 4, but I guess we'll take it any way we can get it. This is the first time in a long time that I am actively cheering for the Braves.
Philip Humber is on the mound tonight. A rookie making his first major league start in the middle of an excruciatingly tight pennant race. Hey, can he be any worse than Glavine last night?
Philip Humber is on the mound tonight. A rookie making his first major league start in the middle of an excruciatingly tight pennant race. Hey, can he be any worse than Glavine last night?
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
One More Year for Glavine?
I was surprised to read a story in the New York Post today by Kevin Kernan who writes about Tom Glavine returning for yet another season. He cites Glavine as saying he's having "too much fun" to retire right now.Wow, what a difference a year makes. This is the same guy who was courting with the Braves after last season?
Hey, if Glavine continues to show that he can pitch well I wouldn't mind having him back for one more year although that might delay the return of Mike Pelfrey and the appearance of Philip Humber for another year. But that might not be a bad thing. Often young pitchers are brought up way too early and fail, so they're tossed aside. Giving Humber & Pelfrey another year of minor league experience with some time in the majors might be a good thing.
But then again Glavine might change his mind if the Mets win a certain few games towards the end of October.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)